Posts Tagged ‘sec’

Blacked out

Black jersey’s and a black out can’t save the #3 Dawgs from the Tide.

I really should preface this by saying that I’ve been at Taco Mac all night drinking beer and now I’m sipping on a celebratory Jack Daniels on the rocks.

The Tide’s offensive line dominated the Dawgs in the first half and the defense held Heisman hopeful Knowshon Moreno to 34 yards on the ground.  Despite what the final score may show, Georgia had no shot in this game.  Bama owned them from the opening kick.

Prior to this game, Bama hand’t played anyone tough (and that includes Clemson).  UGA was their measuring stick and the measured up.  I think its time to start thinking about winning the SEC West and contending for the SEC title.

I may have more on this game tomorrow, but for now I’m too happy and too tipsy to put together coherent thoughts concerning this game.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Tags: , , , , ,

Fall of Troy

I can’t tell you how glad I am that USC lost.

I was getting tired of all the “Who is USC going to play in the championship game?” articles and talk.  They had only played 3 games!!  And this is a USC team that has managed to lose at least one game a year that they had no business losing the last 3 years.

You also have to consider that with the Pac-10 being in the crapper so far, whose to say that USC would have even made it to the title game after the computers chewed them up and spit them out?  There are several Big 12 and SEC teams that play tougher schedules and have the ability to run the table.  You could very well see a Big 12 - SEC title game.

Bottom line - now people can stop talking about USC’s and their automatic spot in the title game.

Filed under: Misc News and Thoughts

Tags: , ,

Week 3 Thoughts

Here’s some random thoughts on the week 3 games after having a day to digest everything.

- As I watched the Maryland-Cal game, something stuck me: it wasn’t too long ago that these were two programs on the rise.  Neither seems to have been able to make the leap to occasional challenger to elite power.

The team Ralph Friedgen inherited in 2001 had gone 5-6 the previous year.  They went 10-2 and won the ACC and followed that up with 11-3 (2002) and 10-3 (2003).  In 2004, things seemed to turn sour, with the Terps going 5-6 followed by 5-6 in 2005.  They snuck up on some folks in 2006 and finished 9-4, only to drop back to mediocre in 2007 at 6-7.  They just can’t seem to take that next step to become a major player in the ACC year in and year out.  With the ACC having an off year so far, maybe this is the year Maryland can turn things around.

In 2003, Jeff Tedford finally got his shot as head coach, taking over a Cal team that had won only 1 game the previous season.  He immediately raised expectations when he finished 7-5 in his first season.  Over the next few seasons, Cal steadily improved, going 8-6 (2003), 10-2 (2004), and 8-4 (2005).  Tedford finally broke through and lead Cal to a 10-3 record and became co-Pac-10 champions in 2006.  They promptly took a step back last year, when they 6 of their last 8 and finished 7-6 on the season.  In each year that Tedford has been at Cal, they have been mentioned as the team that could knock USC of their throne, but each year they slip up against teams that they should beat.  They just can’t seem to become the Pac-10 challenger that the conference needs.

It was strange to see these two teams who are on opposite sides of the country and have taken the same path face off.

- Speaking of the Maryland game, they have one ugly end-zone.  It’s not as bad as the one in Knoxville, but it’s certainly not attractive.  I don’t understand why they decided to put the state flag in the end zone as opposed to the team name or logo.

- Did anyone else notice that stands were pretty bare at the Clemson-NCSU game?  The cameras panned the crowd right after the start of the 3rd quarter and it looked like an Atlanta Hawks game.  The announcer even mistakenly said a “crowd of 80” before correcting himself to 80,000.  Memorial Stadium has a seating capacity of 80,301 and the attendance for the game was reported as 76,500.  But the stands looked to be holding considerably less.  I was hoping that the good people of Clemson had finally realized that their season could only end in heartbreak as long as Tommy Bowden was their coach and decided not to show up in protest.  But I guess that’s not the case.

- USC dominated Ohio State.  It wasn’t even close.  USC looked like they were playing a high school team.  That makes 3 straight big games in which Ohio State has choked.  At some point, the coaches and the AP writers will have to realize that they are over rated and stop ranking them in the top 5, right?  It’s one thing to beat up on the weak teams in the Big Ten, but its whole different beast trying to beat teams with equal or greater talent than you.  And Ohio Stat just can’t do it.

- The Gamecocks seem to have some sort of hex on the Bulldogs.  They always manage to keep the game close, no matter the talent disparity (and it is considerable).  They almost stole the game from the Dawgs, but Chris Smelley struck again and threw a killer pick near the goal line in the closing seconds that would have sent the game in to OT.  SC also lost a fumble in the end zone that could have tied it up earlier in the game.  But in the end the Dawgs escaped and their title hopes live on.

- Another thing I noticed about the UGA game was the announcers unashamed love for Matthew Stafford.  They couldn’t do enough to kiss the ass of the “best NFL QB prospect in the country”.  This is the same Matthew Stafford who needed his defense to make plays to beat the Gamecocks because he couldn’t.  The same Matthew Stafford that could only manage 146 yards and no TDs against SC.  When he made a mistake, it was the fault of his offensive line or his receivers.  In fact, the announcers were talking about his progression over the years and mentioned that he struggled at times last year.  And why did he struggle?  Not because he’s not a very good QB or because he makes poor decisions.  It was because “his receivers let him down.”  When will people stop making excuses for Stafford?  If he played on any other team, he’d be labeled a bust or an underachiever.  But fortunately for him he has a great offensive line and a stable of stud running backs that are able to carry the team.  Because he is clearly not cut out to do so.

- Sure it was against Nevada, but Chase Daniel put up some impressive numbers.  That kid is good.  He‘s another one who falls into the height trap that I don’t understand.  Under 6 foot and foolishly shunned by the big schools in favor of “prototypical” QB’s.

- The Tide seemed to get their act together again, after not scoring an offensive TD against Tulane.  Arkansas is up next and Bama hasn’t won in Fayetteville since 2002.  They are to Alabama as SC is to UGA.  They just play us tough every year, no matter how good or bad they are.  This will be the first real test (and no, Clemson was not a test) that the Tide will face.  This will give us a better idea of how the season will go.

- And I have to include this, since Mickey is a Michigan fan, but they performed poorly against Notre Dame.  Michigan turned the ball over 6 times.  With that many turnovers, even Notre Dame will be able to stay in the game.  The good news is that Michigan has a much brighter future ahead of them.  Rodriguez has been able to win at every place he’s coach.  Weis struggled against New Mexico State, despite having the talent from three straight top 5 recruiting classes on his side.

- I’m guessing that the win over Tennessee was just a fluke.

Filed under: Weekly Thoughts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Knowshon’s leap

By now, most people have probably already seen Knowshon Moreno’s leap.

Unless, that is, you were waiting to see it on Sports Center.  Apparently, the worldwide leader buried the UGA highlights and didn’t even show Moreno’s leap.  And Mark Richt is complaining about it.

According to Richt, “They missed the boat or didn’t do their homework or whatever. I don’t know how they couldn’t have noticed that as thorough as it seems like that are most of the time.”

Here’s the deal coach.  You are playing the Central Michigan Chippewas and you blew them out.  You’re not going to be the lead highlight on ESPN, especially when there are upsets to show.  And really, who cares what Knowshon does against a small time team?  Outside Athens, GA, no one.  Had this come against the elite athletes that play for USC, Florida or Oklahoma, then it would be noteworthy.  But he’s leaping over an undersized safety who wasn’t good enough to get a scholarship offer from a Big Ten school, including Northwestern.  Why is that supposed to be mind blowing?

Don’t get me wrong, it was a nice play.  But for Richt to chastise ESPN for not playing it is ridiculous.  Had it been a truly, utterly amazing play, then I could see his point.  But its not as impressive as Richt seems to think.

Filed under: Player News

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Thoughts after Week 2

Some random thoughts about week after having a day to digest everything.

- Washington got screwed. I understand that the excessive celebration penalty was called as it is stated in the NCAA rule book, but I think the spirit of the rule was not upheld.  Did Locker toss the football in the air?  Yes.  Did he do it to taunt BYU or excessively celebrate?  No.  He was charged up from scoring in the final seconds of the game to seemingly send the game to OT and give his team a chance to win.  There is a lot of emotion in college football and as long as Locker wasn’t doing it in an unsportsman like manner (and he wasn’t), then it shouldn’t be called.  The game should have been decided on the field and not by a poor call by a referee.

- Why were Matthew Stafford and Knowshon Moreno still playing late during their blowout of Central Michigan?  My guess is that it had something to do with padding their stats for thier Heisman campaigns.  But doesn’t Richt know what can happen when a coach foolishly leaves in his best player late in a blowout?  That was a dangerous move to keep those two in the game, especially when UGA is trying to make a title run.

- Notre Dame looked BAD (3-12 on 3rd down, 4 turnovers) against San Diego State. Jimmy Clausen didn’t look very good and they didn’t run the ball very well (3.1/carry).  And I LOVE it!!!!!  I HATE Notre Dame.  They won 3 games all of last year and they got more coverage than teams like BYU and Cincinnati, that actually had winning seasons.  This year, its more of the same.  They are undeserving of all the hype and media attention they get.  And I hope they fall on their faces again.  HARD!

- Miami is on its way back to being a dominant program.  They played Florida tough, but just ran out of gas at the end.  That is attributed to their lack of quality depth, but that will be solved with a few more recruiting classes like this past one.  Randy Shannon is going to turn them around.

- How about East Carolina?!?! They knock of their 3rd consecutive ranked opponent (going back to the bowl game last year) and their first top 10 team since 1999.  And they didn’t just squeak by West Virginia - they DOMINATED them.  Looks like Skip Holtz could be on his way to a Conference USA title and giving BYU a run at being this years BCS buster.  Keep your eye on ECU.

- If Alabama is going to be taken seriously, then they’ll need to have more games like the Clemson game and less like the Tulane game.  They didn’t score a single offensive TD and only had 172 total yards.  Sure, they were missing some O-Linemen, but they need to execute better to be able to beat the heavy weights in the SEC.

- The ACC didn’t do much to redeemed itself after being beat up in week 1.  Maryland was whipped by Midde Tennessee State, Duke lost to Northwestern in the Turd Bowl, Virginia managed to only put up 16 points against FCS team Richmond and Miami was beaten by Florida.  When they added BC, VT and Miami back in 2004, they expected to beocome the new superpower in college football.  We are still patiently awaiting that moment.

- Sam Bradford continues to put up better numbers than Matthew Stafford agasint similar (if not better) competition.  Why does he still not get as much Heisman love?

Filed under: Weekly Thoughts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

South Carolina looks terrible

If you had asked me 4 years ago if the Gamecocks would lose to Vanderbilt 2 years in a row, I would say you’re crazy.  A Steve Spurrier fall to the Comadores twice in a row?  No way.

But that’s exactly waht happened last night.

The Gamecocks have looked terrible in both games this year.  Sloppy QB play has really hurt them.  Really, their whole offense has looked out of sync.  It reminds me of watching a high school football game.

And I can’t believe the this is the best product Spurrier can field.  If you look at the quality of the teams he’s fielded and his body language, I would guess that Spurrier’s heart simply isn’t in it any more.  Gone are the visor throwing and headset smashing days.  Now Spurrier just stands on the sidelines looking crestfallen after each Chris Smelley INT.

Unless the Gamecoks turn can get their act together and play better on offense, they’ll be below .500 on the year and Spurrier will hang it up at the end of the season.  And it doesn’t get any easier with games against UGA, LSU, Florida and Clemson.

And the Gamecock fans will be wishing that they hadn’t let Skip Holtz leave with his father.

Filed under: Game Thoughts

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Triple the Fun

The question was posed to me today - “Can Georgia Tech succeed in the ACC running the triple option that Paul Johnson employed at Navy?”

I say yes it can.

Just about any offense can succeed in college football if you have the right players, the right coaching and excellent execution (except for the West Coast offense…but that’s another story).

We already know that Johnson can coach. Anyone who can make Navy football semi-relevant again has to have some coaching skills. He doesn’t have the perfect players to run the triple option, but that is easily remedied through recruiting (which will take a few years). And once he’s go the players, it’s simply a matter of repetition and good coaching and they will have the execution part down as well. So yes, you can succeed running the triple option.

The big knocks against the triple option are that A) you can’t recruit players for that offense (i.e. no one wants to play in that offense) and B) there is too much speed in the major BCS conferences to be successful.

The first point is ridiculous. Go watch any 5 high school games in your area on any given Friday night. You know what kind of offense they are running? A variation of the triple option. Nebraska was able to recruit top high school players to run that offense until they stopped running it in 2004. There are always going to be good players who will fit into and are willing to play in the triple option. And if Johnson can convince a kid to play football at Navy (and thus, enroll in the service) then I think he can convince a kid to come to Georgia Tech (despite the 600:1 guys to girls ratio).

The second point is even more ridiculous. Nebraska was successful up through 2003 (they won 10 games and even played in the 2001 BCS championship game) running a variation of triple option. The Big 12 has lots of speed and Nebraska was successful. If the speed thing were true, then all those spread options would fail as well. They are both based on the quarterback’s ability to read the defense and either pitch the ball or run with it. With the right QB, you can neutralize much of the speed issue with any iteration of the option.

What it boils down to is that Johnson can flat out coach, he’ll get the players to run the option and he’ll be successful in the ACC running the triple option.

If you don’t believe me, remember this: everyone said that Urban Meyer’s spread option wouldn’t work in the SEC because of all the speed on defense.

And I think things have turned out pretty well for Urban Meyer and his Gators thus far.

Filed under: Conference News

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Georgia State…are you ready for some football?

The Georgia State Panthers will begin playing football in 2010.

As a resident of Atlanta, I am looking forward to this. For one, you can never have too many options when it comes to watching football. Secondly, it opens the possibility of one day having 3 Division 1-A teams in the state of Georgia, and that would be pretty cool.

Most importantly, I am holding out hope that another college team in the state of Georgia will reduce the amount of quality Georgia high school players that end up at UGA (and become stars). I will always root for the SEC, but as a Bama fan, I’ll take any competitive advantage I can get in the most competitive conference in the land.

Filed under: FCS News

Tags: , , , , ,